ok, so if i can figure this out right.. and i will use phil/roeb/laevi/palawanense as an example..
1. the process of genetic study within the species might be boring... ok, so the fact that i'm liking the idea means I really need to get a life!
2. the plants have to be classified correctly first to work out whether the DNA sequence that arises matches the expected result... so if people are using length of petals as a guide to differentiate, then if the results show that plants with short and long petals intermingle, then that would disprove that theory. (yes? no?) (check out the glanduliferum A vs B.. is that a process of speciation? could this be happening in the phil/roeb group?)
sorry for all the dumb ass questions....