Rick
Well-Known Member
You might well want to stone me! I’d understand that, really! Does anyone wonder if this is a dianthum??? I myself (me, myself and I) wonder if this is too good a flower for being dianthum. Let alone the entire plant, which I’d love to buy for a lot of money…. I have a feeling that dianthum x parishii should be looking like that…. Saying that….: I doubt if anyone would (or has) ever made a hybrid like that.
Needless to say: the pictures (again) are out of this would, and so is the plant.
Aside from the extra pigmentation in the pouch and petals, there is not much else that is parrishii.
Dianthum is known for the compact and clumping growth habit. Also stems and bracts of parrishii are very hairy and generally thicker than dianthum. I can't see any hair on these stems, which are also relatively thin.
I think those hairy stems of parrishii are a strong character that should come through in a simple cross with dianthum.
Dianthum was a fairly recent discovery compared to parrishii. And for many years after its "discovery" it was considered a variety of parrishii. It's not unlikely that a lot of parrishii / dianthum crosses were made during the years when it was considered a variety of parrishii. I have a plant purchased from Oak Hill (around 2002) originally as parrishii, when there was still confusion about the species status of dianthum. It bloomed out as a normal dianthum.
Seems like Ive seen some pale short haired parrishii more intermediate to dianthum than this plant, but really can't recall seeing any verified crosses of the two.