i was under the impression kolopakingii has bigger flower, is a bigger plant and holds 11-14 flowers on a stem, with more brown and less green in the flowers. topperi's should never have more than 7-8 flowers..
i was under the impression kolopakingii has bigger flower, is a bigger plant and holds 11-14 flowers on a stem, with more brown and less green in the flowers. topperi's should never have more than 7-8 flowers..
Cribb's book has topperi as the larger flower (no mention of plant size or flower count). Koopowitz has topperi as the greener flower with no mention of any numbers of any kind.
Cribb's account of the history is that topperi was accredited to a handfull of plants with no particular population data that bloomed in the collections of Simanis Orchids and Richard Topper. The larger flowers (sepals and petals 1.2 - 2.5 cm bigger than plants from the original collection) were first called var. giganteum by Kolopaking himself in 1988, but redescribed by Braem in 1988 as var. Topperi.
It seems like all the accounts of the taxonomy of kolopakingii is based on very limited knowledge of the the population demography of the plant, and more on the description of a handful of plants flowering in collections.
Subsequently Cribb and Koopowitz don't seem to give much credence to any significant variation in kolopakingii
I have seen a dozen or so kolos blooming and only a handful have had 12-14 blooms. Most are in the 6 - 10 range. Magnifico seems to be a clone I've seen with consistently high flower counts. It could also be an age thing, and you may need huge multigrowth plants to get the big flower counts.