JeanLux
Well-Known Member
first flowering of this small plant was in nov. last year, and here some pict. of this year's bloom! Jean
Very nice! What's the natural spread of the plant?
I'm surprized. That's a fairly good size plant. Very nice Jean (I'll be expecting my divison soon! IM me and I'll send you my address!)for the plant +/- 23 cm, flower +/- 7 cm ! Jean
That is very nice! I don't think I've seen that before.
Okay, I'm confused - is it a species or a natural hybrid of hirsutissimum var. esquirolei x helenae? (or barbigerum?) I looked at Stephen's site but there seemed to be confusion on the issue amongst Averyanov and Cribb.
Any resolution?
(hopefully I won't be editing this message a 5th time!) :rollhappy:
Heather,That is very nice! I don't think I've seen that before.
Okay, I'm confused - is it a species or a natural hybrid of hirsutissimum var. esquirolei x helenae? (or barbigerum?) I looked at Stephen's site but there seemed to be confusion on the issue amongst Averyanov and Cribb.
Any resolution?
(hopefully I won't be editing this message a 5th time!) :rollhappy:
Heather,
Here is what Koopowitz had to say in 2000. He may have revised it since.
http://www.rv-orchidworks.com/orchidtalk/paph_doc.pdf
I like your logic Leo!Even DNA anaylsis as being done right now with Cattleya won't tell you much.
A species, even if it is of hybrid origin in the distant past is still a good species. I do not see reports of intermediate forms favoring helenae or hirsustissimum. All the hermanii I have see in person and in photos, is clearly hermanii = this argues against recent hybrid origin for the species. Hermanii may very well be a good species just as ancient in lineage as heleneae or henryanum.
http://www.orchid.or.jp/orchid/people/tanaka/envietpaph7.html
Here is another source of info on P. herrmannii, which if true, brings into question the rareity of this species/natural hybrid.
Enter your email address to join: