I agree. They are Schroederae. They are deep pink, not red. Also, they have the a correctly shaped staminode. The flower in this thread does not. It is more rounded than it should be. Also, the two photos on Phragweb show a slight remnant of a horm on either side of the pouch, the one in this thread does not. The spotted area on the back of the inside opening of the pouch on both the Phragweb photos is complete and touching, all the way up and behind the staminode. The flower in this thread's photo is not. Also, very notably, in the Phragweb photos, the dorsal sepal and synsepal are not richly coloured, as is expected with Schroederae. The flower in this thread's photo has wonderful rich red colour on both the dorsal sepal and synsepal.
In your original post, where you disagree with me, you say: "Definitely w/in the bounds of a Schroderae though." I strongly disagree with that statement. If this flower is a true Schroederae, it is a very exceptional one; not one that a person would expect to see.....not as "normal" or "average" as you seem to be arguing.
Eric, I'm not trying to be a pain for you. I'm not wanting a fight or to argue; but, you did contradict me and I'm just defending my viewpoint now. I've said all that I can. People can agree or not....or, they can at least wonder about the validity of the name. I don't care. I was just commenting from the point of view of someone who is experienced and feels that he knows something about this. If you still disagree, then, we'll have to just leave it at that. Hopefully, you don't have any hard feelings because I don't accept your opposition to my opinion.