John M
Orchid Addict
I’m getting your point John. Regarding the size issue:
I agree, you are right! We haven’t been given the flower dimensions before. I have used the wire, clip and wooden-stick to arrive at my judgement, which is not very professional, I admit. On that base the flower does/would appear small, even in hangianum terms.
The first time I have ever seen a Harold Koopowitz I nearly passed out because of is enormity. I do know that H.K. hybrids do pass on the “big flower gens”…
Of course, as we debate this, I recognise that nobody is going to be proven to be correct. The provenence of this plant is unknown (at this point) and we are only making educated guesses here. However, I believe that size only is a very weak criteria to use in identification. When you think about any plants, be they dandelions, trilliums, arisaema, etc., there are always some very large clones and some very small ones in the same colony. While the "good" ones are normally big to huge, I've seen some very small roths and downright tiny malipoenses as well as some very small armeniacums and micranthums. Also, perhaps the MSU fertilizer, which seems to be causing some sort of deficiency in this case, has reduced the size of these blooms???