doesn't look like gratrix. x call. to me, at least not what I'd expect. If you said gratrix. x barb.? or barb. x henry? .... well OKWhat's this?
Looks like gratrix X henry to me but the post I got it from, Braum calls it a species.doesn't look like gratrix. x call. to me, at least not what I'd expect. If you said gratrix. x barb.? or barb. x henry? .... well OK
Thanks Olaf, So you agree Paph hrantuanhii is a valid species? About the blackish one, I'm very interested in it! Especially if it turns out to be a species. It's so small and unique with the greenish/white synsepal, broad white border on the dorsal and blaskish/purple the rest of itTHe first shown picture is the described Paph. trantuanhii.
It cannot be the cross between gratrixianum and henryanum, especially when you look to the small growth.
The blackish one is not in trade and I get only the picture some years ago and I am waiting for further informations.
Best greetings
Olaf
Me too!Thanks Olaf, So you agree Paph hrantuanhii is a valid species? About the blackish one, I'm very interested in it! Especially if it turns out to be a species. It's so small and unique with the greenish/white synsepal, broad white border on the dorsal and blaskish/purple the rest of it
How about this one?
Dear Robert,
it is always interesting to see this picture of the black one. I get the picture 2 years ago from Vietnam. A friend made this. I used the picture in my presentations and also on one orchid forum, but now the picture is going around. The same is with the other picture on the vietnamese page. I get it 3 years ago for analyzing together with some other pictures fro the habitata.
Best greetings
Olaf
Enter your email address to join: