USA request for input CITES

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mormodes

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
626
Reaction score
11
Location
N Calif, USA
OK, I'm not sure how this post will look since I copied it from the OGD, but since we've been discussing the USA's interpretation of CITES this looks like a good way to get your input to the people in charge. I hope the links work.


Subject: CITES - 16th Meeting, Conference of the Parties
SUBMIT by August 15, 2011. USF&WS invites you to provide [them] with information and recommendations on animal and plant species that should be considered as candidates for U.S. proposals to amend Appendices I and II of CITES at the upcoming sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16). http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/2011/2011-14605.html This is the beginning of the process to make amendments. Some posts here speak to how CITES needs reform. Now is the time to get items on the agenda. These meetings happen once every two years. Submit directly [email protected].

Background Orchids and CITES To ensure that international orchid trade is not detrimental to the survival of wild populations, the entire orchid family (Orchidaceae), including all U.S. native orchids, was listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) Appendix II in 1975. Today, several orchid species and two large genera (Phragmipedium and Paphiopedilum) are listed in Appendix I, while the vast majority of orchids remain listed in Appendix II of CITES. CITES Parties also recognize that, in general, artificial propagation of plants should be encouraged to reduce collection pressure on wild populations. Special provisions exist for trade in plants of artificially propagated Appendix-II orchids. In addition, hybrids of certain Appendix-II orchids (i.e., Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Phalaenopsis and Vanda) that meet specific requirements are exempt from CITES regulations. Orchids and CoP15Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Doha (Qatar), 13-25 March 2010 http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/index.shtml Decisions of the Conference of the Parties to CITES in effect after the15th meeting http://www.cites.org/eng/dec/index.shtmlOrchids: annotation for species included in Appendix II http://www.cites.org/eng/dec/valid15/14_133-134.shtml
 
how can someone like me help to change the policy? should i send a note suggesting Paphs/Phrags/Etc in flask be exempted or otherwise acceptable?
 
OK, I'm not sure how this post will look since I copied it from the OGD, but since we've been discussing the USA's interpretation of CITES this looks like a good way to get your input to the people in charge. I hope the links work.


Subject: CITES - 16th Meeting, Conference of the Parties
SUBMIT by August 15, 2011. USF&WS invites you to provide [them] with information and recommendations on animal and plant species that should be considered as candidates for U.S. proposals to amend Appendices I and II of CITES at the upcoming sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP16). http://www.fws.gov/policy/library/2011/2011-14605.html This is the beginning of the process to make amendments. Some posts here speak to how CITES needs reform. Now is the time to get items on the agenda. These meetings happen once every two years. Submit directly [email protected].

Background Orchids and CITES To ensure that international orchid trade is not detrimental to the survival of wild populations, the entire orchid family (Orchidaceae), including all U.S. native orchids, was listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) Appendix II in 1975. Today, several orchid species and two large genera (Phragmipedium and Paphiopedilum) are listed in Appendix I, while the vast majority of orchids remain listed in Appendix II of CITES. CITES Parties also recognize that, in general, artificial propagation of plants should be encouraged to reduce collection pressure on wild populations. Special provisions exist for trade in plants of artificially propagated Appendix-II orchids. In addition, hybrids of certain Appendix-II orchids (i.e., Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Phalaenopsis and Vanda) that meet specific requirements are exempt from CITES regulations. Orchids and CoP15Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Doha (Qatar), 13-25 March 2010 http://www.cites.org/eng/cop/index.shtml Decisions of the Conference of the Parties to CITES in effect after the15th meeting http://www.cites.org/eng/dec/index.shtmlOrchids: annotation for species included in Appendix II http://www.cites.org/eng/dec/valid15/14_133-134.shtml
My take on this should be clear. I consider CITES to be nonsense (not to use another word), and nonsense remains nonsence no matter how much you "tune" it.
 
how can someone like me help to change the policy? should i send a note suggesting Paphs/Phrags/Etc in flask be exempted or otherwise acceptable?

They already are exempt when produced from legal sources.

I doubt it will help if you ask them to make all sources legal.

CITES (people) doesn't care what you want or think. CITES is not about conservation of species. CITES is about control of people.
 
1. Change the CITES, the policy, remove existing people at the top, the middle and all its henchmen, Cribb, de Vogel etc.
2. Anything in the flasks should be deemed legal
3. New CITES should control the governments (member) from wholesale destruction of native forest and habitat. (No 1 Indonesia, no2 Malaysia No3. Papua New Guinea No 4 etc
 
Back
Top