correct.All are very nice, album form is very rare.I think both are not superbiens, but curtisii, as I know, two taxons are different species today.
I bought these from Orchid Inn as seedlings of P. superbiens. Could you please direct me to the most recent literature that recognizes curtisii as a valid species. Kew lists curtisii as a synonym and elsewhere I have seen it listed as a variety of superbiens.All are very nice, album form is very rare.I think both are not superbiens, but curtisii, as I know, two taxons are different species today.
No not really. I am fine with calling these curtisii, but in the past I was told that no they are superbiens. If there is settled nomenclature for these plants could someone please direct me to the publication?You are trying to reignite fires here!![]()
There isn't! And I'm not the one to open the whole can of worms, that Eric is hinting at!If there is settled nomenclature for these plants could someone please direct me to the publication?
I almost forgot to praise the gorgeousnes of your albinistic form, fma. sanderae!Your plant is really a true Paphiopedilum curtisii. Some years ago the true Paph. superbiens was found again and this Shows the clear differences to curtisii. Her eat first two different clones of curtisii
View attachment 16835
Paphiopedilum curtisii
and now the true superbiens View attachment 16836 Paphiopedilum superbiens
Here an old print of the typical Paph. superbiens
View attachment 16837
Best greetings
Olaf