The tags say Paph Supersuk 'Eureka' AM/AOS X Raisin Pie 'Hsinying' X sib

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
M

McPaph

Guest
The tags say Paph Supersuk 'Eureka' AM/AOS X Raisin Pie 'Hsinying' X sib
These two have the same tag but look so different.
Can they be from the same cross? All the ones Ive seen on the Internet all look a little different too. I have one more of these and it looks a little different also. Its more like the first one.
The second one I like alot.
pic 1
purple.jpg


pic 2
raisenpie2.jpg
 
There is NO WAY those two are the same cross. I might believe that the top flower is what the tag says; but, the bottom flower is something else entirely! You need to get back to the vendor about this.
 
I agree with John, there is no way they are the same.
Based on Susan's plant I would say that the first plant is tagged correctly, and the plant should look like the typical maudiae type hybrid.
The bottom plant looks like a paph dayanum hybrid
 
I agree with John, there is no way they are the same.
Based on Susan's plant I would say that the first plant is tagged correctly, and the plant should look like the typical maudiae type hybrid.
The bottom plant looks like a paph dayanum hybrid

Maybe wardii too.

Susan
 
Both plants are nice but I'd have to agree with Fren & Susan. I read the cross & waited to scroll down to see pics & thought OK one looks like a Maudiae & the other probably looks like sukhakulii ........ ooops, I don't think so!
 
Paphs with this cross on the tag have been coming out of Hawaii for, literally, the past several years. It's basically a mass market Paph.

Unless each pod produces tons and tons of seed, there's no way they all have the same parents. The supplier has just not seen the necessity to put the proper tag in his plants. There are literally tens of thousands of them. They supply stores and growers with hundreds a month.

I've seen them with farrieanum clearly in the background too. And, with and without warts, hairs, vini coloration, and veining. A better tag would probably be Paph. Maudiae hybrid.

The same supplier puts out a green paph with Makuli as part of the cross. Again, it has been the same tag for years.

Fortunately, they are usually pretty nice, like yours, easy to rebloom, and should be reasonably priced.
 
Paphs with this cross on the tag have been coming out of Hawaii for, literally, the past several years. It's basically a mass market Paph.

Unless each pod produces tons and tons of seed, there's no way they all have the same parents. The supplier has just not seen the necessity to put the proper tag in his plants. There are literally tens of thousands of them. They supply stores and growers with hundreds a month.

I've seen them with farrieanum clearly in the background too. And, with and without warts, hairs, vini coloration, and veining. A better tag would probably be Paph. Maudiae hybrid.

The same supplier puts out a green paph with Makuli as part of the cross. Again, it has been the same tag for years.

Fortunately, they are usually pretty nice, like yours, easy to rebloom, and should be reasonably priced.

I've seen this happen once for phals at walmart. They were all tagged the same and the colours were very varied. The plant was cheap so my mom bought it. But it died and probably likely virused or sick. Phal hybrids are not supposed to slow down and die normally

I think that if you are correct about the mass market tagging, then both plants might be tagged incorrectly. You would think that the producers would understand the orchid hobbiest perspectives on tagging, as they are growers themselves, but obviously not. They likely put the tags in to trick the hobbiest into buying them, I see no other reason as these complex names certainly don't help the regular houseplant grower.
 
Paphs with this cross on the tag have been coming out of Hawaii for, literally, the past several years. It's basically a mass market Paph.

Unless each pod produces tons and tons of seed, there's no way they all have the same parents. The supplier has just not seen the necessity to put the proper tag in his plants. There are literally tens of thousands of them. They supply stores and growers with hundreds a month.

I've seen them with farrieanum clearly in the background too. And, with and without warts, hairs, vini coloration, and veining. A better tag would probably be Paph. Maudiae hybrid.

The same supplier puts out a green paph with Makuli as part of the cross. Again, it has been the same tag for years.

Fortunately, they are usually pretty nice, like yours, easy to rebloom, and should be reasonably priced.

I've seen this, as well. Is it Lehua Orchids, or whom?
 
Paphs with this cross on the tag have been coming out of Hawaii for, literally, the past several years. It's basically a mass market Paph.

Unless each pod produces tons and tons of seed, there's no way they all have the same parents. The supplier has just not seen the necessity to put the proper tag in his plants. There are literally tens of thousands of them. They supply stores and growers with hundreds a month.

I've seen them with farrieanum clearly in the background too. And, with and without warts, hairs, vini coloration, and veining. A better tag would probably be Paph. Maudiae hybrid.

The same supplier puts out a green paph with Makuli as part of the cross. Again, it has been the same tag for years.

Fortunately, they are usually pretty nice, like yours, easy to rebloom, and should be reasonably priced.
Oh well. Probably bought to many tags with that name and are trying to save a buck. Irresponsible! (Thats being nice)

The ones that Ive seen on the Internet look close to each other and look nothing like these two. I guess these go in the NOID section.That NOID section is getting big.
Thanks everyone for your help and good comments
 
I've seen this, as well. Is it Lehua Orchids, or whom?

Tony, I have talked to and dealt with Lehua myself. I doubt they are the source of the problem, they are very concerned about getting everything right. I don't think they are the problem. There are others that may be.
 
McPaph,

Keep in mind, there can be a lot of variation in seedlings, especially if the parents are complex hybrids. That said, however, I simply cannot see how any combination of genetic material of the ancestral species (sukhakulii, lawrencianum, mastersianum, barbatum & callosum) of the purported cross could produce the second flower. You are probably wise in calling both NOID, although the first bloom certainly could be legitimate. And I agree "irresponsible" is far too kind!
 
I know this is rather an old thread, but since I have seen so many plants of this cross, I'll have to say something after seeing what a few members have said based on the flower appearance.
While it's understandable, with a hybrid like this, that has rather "complex" history of mixing this and that, often the result of genetic variation is beyond belief, so logical imagination should not rule over the tag.

First of all, this cross is HIGHLY variable.
With that said, the first flower is something I have never seen out of this cross, but it is definitely possible and one can easily see it too, it's very much barbartum with dark color.
The second one is something I have seen quite a few of, actually.
So there!

Vast majority I have seen came out coloratum and in the shape of typical maudiae look or maukuli.
There were quite many vinis also, but nowhere near as common as coloratum.
The leaves are usually quite attractive and uniform with nice checkered pattern like curtisii or lawrenceanum type of markings.

Trust me, I have seen boxes full of these for years. :)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top