Very nice flowers! I am surprised, too, that the one dose of roth is still quite obvious from 3 generations ago, while the two later portions of sanderianum are not very evident.
Deena Nicole = philippinense x glanduliferum var. praestans
Booth's Sand Lady = Lady Isabel x sanderianum
It is fragrant like a rothschildianum !
Which means this hybrid is:
62.5% sanderianum
12.5% philippinense
12.5% praestans
6.25% stonei
6.25% rothschildianum
Yes, I would also expect to see it look more like a Paph. sanderianum, and less like a rothschildianum. This cross almost looks like it is 50% rothschildianum! Interesting result!
Robert
I thought that for more sandy to show itself, sandy needs to be one of the parents, not just a majority from the background. So even though Booth's Sands lady would contribute more than 50% sanderianum, its not enough for the long petalled traits to come through. Back crossing so there is 50% sandy not really helpful in preserving the long-petal trait (e.g. Angel Hair x PEOY = 50% sandy, but looks more like long petalled St. Swithin).
Or maybe the Booth's Sands lady used a PEOY as a parent, and not a true sanderianum?
This cross was Paph. (Deena Nicole x Booth's Sand dy ) x (sanderianum)
I just find it interesting that in this cross, Paph. rothschildianum seems to be so dominant (even though it is only 6.25% of the cross).
Robert
A nice hybrid, but there should be more Paph. sanderianum - influence. Though there is variation of course, there must be at least 50% sanderianum. I don't really see it.
Enter your email address to join: