Paph. Wölssner Helene

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I love both species...but that is far enough from expected to be quite a disappointment, and make me suspicious as well. I don't say it's ugly by any means, just not what I would have imagined, so we'll just have to wait to see more in bloom! :)
 
I have to side with you Hien. Looks too off to be what it is claimed to be. Even if it is the correct parents, I would have to bloom more before I used this clone in further breeding. The color is fine for me but the shape needs a lot of work.

Actually I'm surprised you guys don't remember the colors of other intra-sectional charlesworthii hybrids. :poke: Generally the charlesworthii dorsal shape, size & color is largely recessive. Good example is (henryanum x charlesworthii) - not much pink in the dorsal, just the white background and a little flushing of pink. The flower superficially resembles an altered color form of henryanum. Paph (barbigerum x chalresworthii) is also more like an improved barbigerum than anything else. Also look at charlesworthii x complex paphs, generally the pink of the dorsal is reduced to either lines, spots or just a small flush of color, rather than a full blown pink dorsal. Even (spicerianum x charlesworthii) looks superficially more like spicerianum than the charlesworthii. With its closest cousins charleworthii is a shy one.

The magic comes in the next generation. That's when you can pick up the color again. I REALLY want to see Wossner Helene crossed to (henryanum x charlesworthii) I think that would be an exciting cross. With charlesworthii on both sides as a grandparent, This could give you white or pink dorsals on a percentage of offspring, helenae for smaller plant stature & yellows and greens, and henryanum for bold spots and pink colors in the petals & pouch - all manner of flower would be possible, some on fairly compact plants. I bet of few would be more like mini-complex reds. A selfing of Wossner Helene would be interesting too, again to recover the charleworthii dorsal in some percentage of the offspring.

Note: when breeding outside it's section charleworthi isn't always recessive. It just seems to be recessive to its close relatives. Outside its section it behaves differently.

Cheers - Leo
 
Actually I'm surprised you guys don't remember the colors of other intra-sectional charlesworthii hybrids. :poke: Generally the charlesworthii dorsal shape, size & color is largely recessive. Good example is (henryanum x charlesworthii) - not much pink in the dorsal, just the white background and a little flushing of pink. The flower superficially resembles an altered color form of henryanum. Paph (barbigerum x chalresworthii) is also more like an improved barbigerum than anything else. Also look at charlesworthii x complex paphs, generally the pink of the dorsal is reduced to either lines, spots or just a small flush of color, rather than a full blown pink dorsal. Even (spicerianum x charlesworthii) looks superficially more like spicerianum than the charlesworthii. With its closest cousins charleworthii is a shy one.

The magic comes in the next generation. That's when you can pick up the color again. I REALLY want to see Wossner Helene crossed to (henryanum x charlesworthii) I think that would be an exciting cross. With charlesworthii on both sides as a grandparent, This could give you white or pink dorsals on a percentage of offspring, helenae for smaller plant stature & yellows and greens, and henryanum for bold spots and pink colors in the petals & pouch - all manner of flower would be possible, some on fairly compact plants. I bet of few would be more like mini-complex reds. A selfing of Wossner Helene would be interesting too, again to recover the charleworthii dorsal in some percentage of the offspring.

Note: when breeding outside it's section charleworthi isn't always recessive. It just seems to be recessive to its close relatives. Outside its section it behaves differently.

Cheers - Leo

All very true! With this kind of breeding you do not always get the results you want in the first generation, and you have to do a two or three step breeding method. I agree I don't like how this primary looks, it brings out the worst characteristics of both parents, and brings out muddy tones, but I do think it would be useful for using as a parent for tea cup paphs. Eventually in the next few generations you can select for plants with flatter dorsals and plants that have nicer colors.

Robert
 
Actually I'm surprised you guys don't remember the colors of other intra-sectional charlesworthii hybrids. :poke: Generally the charlesworthii dorsal shape, size & color is largely recessive. Good example is (henryanum x charlesworthii) - not much pink in the dorsal, just the white background and a little flushing of pink. The flower superficially resembles an altered color form of henryanum. Paph (barbigerum x chalresworthii) is also more like an improved barbigerum than anything else. Also look at charlesworthii x complex paphs, generally the pink of the dorsal is reduced to either lines, spots or just a small flush of color, rather than a full blown pink dorsal. Even (spicerianum x charlesworthii) looks superficially more like spicerianum than the charlesworthii. With its closest cousins charleworthii is a shy one.

The magic comes in the next generation. That's when you can pick up the color again. I REALLY want to see Wossner Helene crossed to (henryanum x charlesworthii) I think that would be an exciting cross. With charlesworthii on both sides as a grandparent, This could give you white or pink dorsals on a percentage of offspring, helenae for smaller plant stature & yellows and greens, and henryanum for bold spots and pink colors in the petals & pouch - all manner of flower would be possible, some on fairly compact plants. I bet of few would be more like mini-complex reds. A selfing of Wossner Helene would be interesting too, again to recover the charleworthii dorsal in some percentage of the offspring.

Note: when breeding outside it's section charleworthi isn't always recessive. It just seems to be recessive to its close relatives. Outside its section it behaves differently.

Cheers - Leo

Thanks Leo. Informitive as always. Up till now I have just been collecting Paphs. It is only recently I have been thinking about breeding. I've decided on concentrating on the species you mentioned as they are colourful and compact (important given my limited space) and easy to grow. I have a couple of flasks each of helenae and henryanum I am growing up as well as a beautiful compact form of charlesworthii with a perfectly shaped flower. So hopefully soon I can start attempting crosses you suggested. I was a bit alarmed by the result of this cross but you have given me the inspiration to take it further.

I have a helenae x henryanum in bud at the moment. I don't think I have seen any photos of that cross. Interesting to see how it turns out.

David
 
Thanks Leo. Informitive as always. Up till now I have just been collecting Paphs. It is only recently I have been thinking about breeding. I've decided on concentrating on the species you mentioned as they are colourful and compact (important given my limited space) and easy to grow. I have a couple of flasks each of helenae and henryanum I am growing up as well as a beautiful compact form of charlesworthii with a perfectly shaped flower. So hopefully soon I can start attempting crosses you suggested. I was a bit alarmed by the result of this cross but you have given me the inspiration to take it further.

I have a helenae x henryanum in bud at the moment. I don't think I have seen any photos of that cross. Interesting to see how it turns out.

David

I would love to see photos of (helenae x henryanum), please post them when they bloom.
 
there is a picture of Paphiopedilum Ministar (helenae x henryanum) posted by Olaf in another forum: http://www.slipperorchidforum.com/forum/showthread.php?p=63436 from all helenae primary hybrids that I have seen, this is the one which will most probably please the large mayority of people... I Like it at all, however, my favorites continue being Wössner Zwerg and Wössner Goldsuk...

(hope it is ok to post the link here)
 
there is a picture of Paphiopedilum Ministar (helenae x henryanum) posted by Olaf in another forum: http://www.slipperorchidforum.com/forum/showthread.php?p=63436 from all helenae primary hybrids that I have seen, this is the one which will most probably please the large mayority of people... I Like it at all, however, my favorites continue being Wössner Zwerg and Wössner Goldsuk...

(hope it is ok to post the link here)

Thanks. I remember seeing that one now. Quite nice. I hope mine turns out as well. It certainly is very easy to grow.

David
 
there is a picture of Paphiopedilum Ministar (helenae x henryanum) posted by Olaf in another forum: http://www.slipperorchidforum.com/forum/showthread.php?p=63436 from all helenae primary hybrids that I have seen, this is the one which will most probably please the large mayority of people... I Like it at all, however, my favorites continue being Wössner Zwerg and Wössner Goldsuk...

(hope it is ok to post the link here)

I was banned from that forum, as are many others here. I am not allowed to use my name or any part of my name on Peter's forum. Which I feel is ridiculous. I have decided to not waste my time where I am not welcome.
 
Paph.jpg


I'm not banned yet Leo so here is Olaf's posting of hen X hel
 
I was banned from that forum, as are many others here. I am not allowed to use my name or any part of my name on Peter's forum. Which I feel is ridiculous. I have decided to not waste my time where I am not welcome.

WOW... but why?

I recently registered in that forum because I wanted to see those pictures... cannot yet say anything good or bad about it...
 
Wow! Very cute. I love the dorsal on this one. Green with a white border and lots of spots! :drool:
 
I really like paph henryanum straight up, or in just about every primary cross it has been put into. Looks like (helenae x henryanum) has got everything I like about henryanum plus the smaller size.

- Kavanaru - Don't bring the issue up over on that site, SOF, you'll get banned yourself. Peter has a strict no selling through contacts made on his site (unless his site gets an annual payment). In his mind - because I have a website that includes my name - if I post an image, and there is any clue as to my ownership of the plant, even just my first name, that constitutes selling through his site, and he wanted $150 a year at the time. He also bans people quickly if there is any criticism or even sarcastic remarks in general. I found it all too frustrating to deal with. He may not be a bad guy in person, I just find it hard to deal with the way he runs his site. This subject has been beaten to death on this site a number of times. It is basically old news & a long story. Others have similar stories. Best to just let the subject die.
 
Here is my own picture, not taken from the other side

72cd924b.jpg


and a second clone

henryanumXhelenaeb.jpg


Best greetings

Olaf
 
- Kavanaru - Don't bring the issue up over on that site, SOF, you'll get banned yourself. Peter has a strict no selling through contacts made on his site (unless his site gets an annual payment). In his mind - because I have a website that includes my name - if I post an image, and there is any clue as to my ownership of the plant, even just my first name, that constitutes selling through his site, and he wanted $150 a year at the time. He also bans people quickly if there is any criticism or even sarcastic remarks in general. I found it all too frustrating to deal with. He may not be a bad guy in person, I just find it hard to deal with the way he runs his site. This subject has been beaten to death on this site a number of times. It is basically old news & a long story. Others have similar stories. Best to just let the subject die.

no problem... I read that here today, and I forgot that here yesterday... :D
 

Latest posts

Back
Top