There are two old awards at 9.8 and 9.9 NS, but those are at least 15 years old.
The dorsal is unfortunate, and it goes through to the offspring which is why you see so few awards to emersonii hybrids. Each judging team would probably approach it differently. Relatively few teams would have a paph specialist on them, and as such I would expect that even though this is a relatively normal thing for the species it would be considered a serious fault.
Even among teams with the experience to recognize this, it would still be a matter of debate. An older judge once told me "Even the best from the dung heap is still dung". In other words, even if it is blooming true to type, it doesn't make it good. I don't share this philosophy, at least for species. For hybrids, sure, if you cross two crappy parents together and get crap, I'm not awarding it even if it is better crap... *grin*