How to represent a genealogical tree with complex ancestry

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Secundino

Adorable Stud
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
2,315
Reaction score
0
Location
Spain
I'm trying to find out the ancestry of one of Yamamotos Dendrobiums (Dendr. Comet King) and so far have managed to find the maternal ancestors (89 times crossed with nobile ... it is really complex!) This - well documented at rhs - is the easy (but time consuming) part.

But how on earth do you represent this, in a visual appealing but space saving way? Has anyone here done it and can help?
Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Nobile used 89 times. Over howw many years?

Nobile is a very common ancestor but unless the same nobile clone was used each time then each nobile use needs to be treated as a separate genetic entry. but then that complicates the tree with parentage of each nobile clone used. You need a big piece of paper!

If you want to illustrate it visually you might use a 3D approach and connect each crossing together with strings of different colors.
 
I'm on my way ... as I have no access to Orchidwiz, I'm compiling myself. That's not the problem. The difficult step is how to represent it.

The first half is nearly done - have a look ... as to now, the oldest cross is Dend. Ainswworthii from 1874 by Dr. Ainsworth. But Veitch and Sanders have their share, too, until in the sixties Yamamoto begins an very extense/intense breeding program. No wonder his plants look like they look!

Dendrobium%20Comet%20King.jpg
 
Last edited:
Somehow - but I cannot copy and paste complex elements - 'sub-trees' like Lady Colman e.g. - that appear more than once and I'd need to extend the page on the right side, but the program just allows the left side ... my pc skills are rudimentary, and I'm afraid I can not use your links, naoki, for the same reason, but thank you all the same.

But it has been a incredible piece of understanding; 12 generations extending to the beginnings of orchid hybridisation, six species involved (so far - still on the first parent), the recurrent use of some early hybrids (or special clones) which must have been outstanding for some reason (I still have to find pictures of them) and it seems it takes this route to fix the characteristics that distinguish a Yamamoto Dendrobium, stout and strong growth, lots of long lasting flowers with heavy substance, big, colourful, upright, round - genetic and lost of feeding.
What is lost - as in all flowering plant that have undergone a breeding program like this - is the dainty beauty, the frail peduncules, the nearly transparent appearance of the petals, the 'wild look' of course.
 
From OrchidWiz I can tell you the completed tree will cover 13 generations, 8 species, and 51 different hybrids involved along the way, going back to Den. Ainsworthii in 1874 as you noted. Den. nobile accounts for a theoretical 45.7% of the ancestry, and I think I'm interpreting this correctly, appearing in the complete family tree 215 times. You've still got some work to do.

The display you show is using a definite row and column grid structure. For me that would suggest using Excel or another spreadsheet program, but my mind tends to go to that because I use it constantly at work. That would allow you copy and paste functionality for repeating branches of the tree, no real limit on rows and columns in the display, and plenty of formatting and drawing tool choices. It might be interesting to color code each species when it appears and see if that highlights any patterns or trends in the breeding.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top