Hong´s Index

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Hakone

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
3,093
Reaction score
270
Hong´s Index for assessment of cypripedium alba Form (copyright)

1/- Staminodes : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
2/- Labellum : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
3/- dorsal sepal : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
4/- Petal : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
5/- lateral sepal : without red pigmentation = 20 P.

to summarize = 100 P. = plants with albinism genes

My definition for Alba forms: a plant whose flowers can be green, yellow or white , or a combination all three , but devoid of any red pigmentation.




Example:

Cypripedium reginae


1/- Staminodes : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
2/- Labellum : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
3/- dorsal sepal : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
4/- Petal : without red pigmentation = 20 P.
5/- lateral sepal : without red pigmentation = 20 P.

to summarize = 100 P. ----------> cypripedium reginae album



 
Last edited:
Dear Hakone!
Your attempt to define an alba form is a respectable and acceptable effort.
I only would like to help to do that:
I think we need to make a new definition: albino.
Albino is the specimen who has no any avability for making any pigment ( as you described)
Alba: who has albino flower but other parts have any pigmentation.
Albescens seu semi alba: flower has absolutely depigmented part (or parts) but has one or more parts has any pigmentation.
Pale form: all of flower parts has any red pigmentetion, but significantly less then normal.
Aureum: none of plant or flower has red pigmentation, but flower or any part has yellow pigmentation.

Eg: a negro man who has white penis (as "flower" called alba, but not albino).
 
Otherwise I think it needs to define a new term: subspecies:
same morphological signs but any little change in rates or colouration, geological appearance is near to each other. Eg: anitum/adductum. I think anitum is not valid species but ssp.
 
Dear Hakone!
Your attempt to define an alba form is a respectable and acceptable effort.
I only would like to help to do that:
I think we need to make a new definition: albino.
Albino is the specimen who has no any avability for making any pigment ( as you described)
Alba: who has albino flower but other parts have any pigmentation.
Albescens seu semi alba: flower has absolutely depigmented part (or parts) but has one or more parts has any pigmentation.
Pale form: all of flower parts has any red pigmentetion, but significantly less then normal.
Aureum: none of plant or flower has red pigmentation, but flower or any part has yellow pigmentation.

Eg: a negro man who has white penis (as "flower" called alba, but not albino).

It is important to note the distinction between the alba forms and albinos.

Albinos : an albino in plants is completely lacking green chlorophyll pigment (analogous human: absence or defect of tyrosinase )

Eg: a negro man who has white penis . For me neither albino nor alba.
 
Otherwise I think it needs to define a new term: subspecies:
same morphological signs but any little change in rates or colouration, geological appearance is near to each other. Eg: anitum/adductum. I think anitum is not valid species but ssp.


Are there geographical differente colouration alba form ?
 
Are there geographical differente colouration alba form ?
Nooo, alba, albino or any colour formation lives at the same place in the same population ( eg. micranthum forms). But ssp. lives in a well determinated area isolated from basic specie (eg. anitum), the basic specie.
 
adductum /anitum : anitum is colored dark as adductum
 
ROFL!!! I know, right?!! I'm trying to absorb this information and that's all I can focus on!!!! I'm doing double takes every time that comes up!
 
The color of the genitalia does not matter. The gene (albinism) plays the cardinal role. A white genital brings out no white children.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top