General Orchid Taxonomy

Discussion in 'Taxonomy' started by Braem, Nov 9, 2006.

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

  1. Apr 10, 2011 #161

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Thái Nguyên, Việt Nam
    Thankyou Olaf,

    Olaf,
    Do you have any recent information about Paph helenae forma delicatum? Are these plants in cultivation? Have you seen any pictures of the plants other than those that accompanied the description?

    Regards and thanks, Mick
     
  2. Apr 10, 2011 #162

    Heather

    Heather

    Heather

    Administrator Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,491
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA. Outside w/ Southeast Exposure
    Mick,
    Guido asked to have his account removed back in 2006 and we have not seen him since, though he is certainly welcome to register again if he likes!
     
  3. Apr 10, 2011 #163

    ORG

    ORG

    ORG

    Guest

    Dear Heather and Mick,
    Guido answered and wrote that he would particpate agin when there is an interest for and when he would get an invitation for the participation.

    I tried to translate his words correctly.

    About Paph. helenae forma delicatum. I have no more information aboutt. I heard only that some plants came in trade in Europe but that these plants were no delicatum, only typical helenae.

    Best greetings

    Olaf
     
  4. Apr 11, 2011 #164
    I would love to see Guido back on this forum. (Please don't hate me for it, Uri....) Guido is no doubt a polarizing personality, but he really does know a lot, and if people could just hold back from encouraging his belligerent side, there is much to be learned from him.
     
  5. Apr 11, 2011 #165

    Heather

    Heather

    Heather

    Administrator Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,491
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA. Outside w/ Southeast Exposure
    I have re-activated Dr. Braem's account at his request. Hopefully we'll be seeing him around here again soon. :)
     
  6. Apr 11, 2011 #166

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Thái Nguyên, Việt Nam
    Good news.
     
  7. Apr 11, 2011 #167

    valenzino

    valenzino

    valenzino

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    3
    I will be interested in opinions and information about the difference between Paph.violascens and Paph. bouganvillieanum.In my opinion,Paph.bouganvillieanum,even if is quite different,can be considered a variety of Paph.violascens.

    Thanks
     
  8. Apr 11, 2011 #168

    Braem

    Braem

    Braem

    Guest

    You are not alone with that opinion, and Henry Oakeley and I also expressed that view in our recently published "Paphiopedilum species - The essential Guide". But that takes us back to one of the main problems of plant taxonomy ... how different do two entities have to be to be considered as two autonomous entities?
     
  9. Apr 11, 2011 #169

    valenzino

    valenzino

    valenzino

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thanks Dr.Braem,
    I understand the problem,and I am not shure about what its best.
    But I will try to group some species under varietal names to make more "intuitive" and easy this system that sometimes is tricky.Will also be easy for the peoples that are new to a group to try to understand the evolution of the plant in certain areas.(like for example,the barbigerum group that its really confusing).
     
  10. Apr 11, 2011 #170

    Braem

    Braem

    Braem

    Guest

    It all depends what side you are on. If you live off selling species, you would want it to be a separate species ...
    At the end of the day, the problem for a hobbyist is nonexistant. Whether you have the plant as P. bougainvilleanum or as P. violascens var. bougainvillenum or as P. violascens subspecies bougainvilleanum or as P. violascens forma bougainvilleanum ... does not change the plant. And that is the same for hookerae and volonteanum, and many other "complexes". The problem also is with the hybrids ... as various "varieties" will give quite distinct hybrids ... and that is a serious issue for hybrid taxonomy. Thus, the issue is far more complex than most people realize.
     
  11. Apr 12, 2011 #171
    So Guido...what's your take on "viniferum"....a valid species or "just another callosum"?
     
  12. Apr 12, 2011 #172

    Braem

    Braem

    Braem

    Guest

    viniferum

    let me put it this way: I have serious doubts whether that should be considered an autonomous species.
     
  13. Apr 12, 2011 #173

    Pete

    Pete

    Pete

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hawai'i
    thank you much for your commentary and opinions Guido
     
  14. Apr 12, 2011 #174

    valenzino

    valenzino

    valenzino

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thanks,yes hybrids taxonomy is extremely complicate,and getting worst,I understand.
    What do you think about Paphiopedilum canhii?
    In jannuary I was in Asia and had the luck to see one in flower.Its really something different.Do you think is correct to put it in barbata group or new group should be created for it?
     
  15. Apr 13, 2011 #175

    Braem

    Braem

    Braem

    Guest

    Paph canhii

    When I first saw a picture of P. canhii my thoughts went towards hybrids ... but I simply have too little information about the plant. Dr. Oakeley and I have chosen not to include it in "Paphiopedilum species - the essential Guide". If however, I ever see a picture of it growing in the wild, I will be more than happy to accept it as a natural entity.

    Just a little comment about the naming: the species name is given by whoever publishes the species. Thus P. canhii MAY mean that Mr. Canh found the plant. Phrag. kovachii was not discovered ny M. kovach, and P. braemii was not discovered by me, etc. etc. Thus, to deduce facts from a name can be a bit tricky.
     
  16. Apr 13, 2011 #176

    valenzino

    valenzino

    valenzino

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thanks Dr. Braem,
    When I first seen the photos I immediately thinked of a new genuine specie.There are photos of the plant in the wild.Mr Cahn also is posting them on this Forum or you can find them googling.I think is very interesting plant,someway primitive between parvisepalums and barbata types...but also have some characteristics of others and some unique to it....

    http://www.slippertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19039&highlight=canhii&page=4

    About names,I will be more happy with a "descriptive" ones instead of nameing them with "human" names(less rage in nameing new plants,so less confusion,and more intuitive understanding of the topic,with easy memory access...)...but in reality i dont care a lot about why are like this....There are no name tags in the jungle :) !!
     
  17. Apr 13, 2011 #177

    Marc

    Marc

    Marc

    Guest

    Dr. Braem, in the photography section there is a topic regarding canhii atm. I included a link in that thread which links to a japanese orchid society page. It shows photo's made during a presentation that included Paph. canhii.

    There were in situ pics included in the presentation:

    http://www.orchid.or.jp/orchid/society/paphio/saloon-62.htm

    In that canhii topic on the forum here it was mentioned that it was presentation given by Dr. Tanaka.

    I can't vouch for the reliability of the photo's or the info in general though.
     
  18. Apr 13, 2011 #178

    Braem

    Braem

    Braem

    Guest

    Thanks for the message ... I wonder why it is not included in the Kew list?
     
  19. Apr 13, 2011 #179

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Thái Nguyên, Việt Nam
    Dr. Braem
    When I first saw a picture of P. canhii I thought it was a freak hybrid too. Although I haven't seen canhii in-situ, I have seen enough freshly collected plants in a remote location to now make me believe otherwise and Dr Tanaka's pictures certainly don't looked staged.

    Regards, Mick
     
  20. Apr 13, 2011 #180

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    quietaustralian

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Thái Nguyên, Việt Nam
    Dr Braem,
    It's on the Kew list.
    Paphiopedilum canhii Aver. & O.Gruss, Orchids (West Palm Beach) 79: 288 (2010).
    This name is accepted.


    Regards, Mick
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2011

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page



arrow_white