Yes but they get 99 times more water than nutrients anyway. Water and CO2are not really my concern. They always get about the same amount ie; whenever they are dry. Varying the NPK in that water does vary the results though.
Assuming they get as much water as they could possibly use, the limiting factor then becomes N etc.
Actually you missed my point that most of us limit growth not by shortages of inorganic nutrients by by limiting water. Your explosive growth is most likely due to watering 3 times a day as opposed to a grower with a potted phal giving an ice cube a week who is afraid to rot the roots off.
Plants must transpire a lot of water to fix carbon. And 97 percent of water goes in and out of plants with only 3% going to metabolism. And according to the plant physiology books, it takes about 800 to 1200 moles of water to fix 1mole of CO2 (and 1 mole of cellulose needs 6 moles of CO2). The solid structures of plants are mostly cellulose, which actually has no NPK incorporated into it (cellulose is C6 H10 O5) repeated over and over into huge polymeric structures.
A gram of new plant is 1% inorganics or 10mg of inorganic nutrients.
But conservative water use in plants indicates it will take about 200 ml of water to grow that 1 gram of tissue that contains 10mg of fert. So at .8dS/M that's a TDS of ~550 mg/L. 200 ml of fert at that concentration holds 110 mg of NPK..... or about 10 times what the plant needs to make a gram of fresh growth.
So now it just goes back to what the plant does to handle the excess fert. But you are definitely not N limiting.