Hey, are you talking to me? I certainly wasn't talking to you, a piece of ****! Now that is an insult!I don't care... just making light of an objective topic, it's all theory, there are too many variables for one perspective too be 100 percent correct, so, tom-de entertain yourself by lashing out an insult...hahaha
What a moronic comment. That's something I would only expect from someone like Donald Trump. Hey wait a minute, I recall Donald said the same thing. Obviously, this is where you are getting a lot of your 'alternative facts'.Record cold everywhere. It must be global warming-cooling? :rollhappy:
Yesterday with 16.5° C we had the warmest Silvester in Germany. It was warmer only in 1961 with 17° and in a lot of years in the century before.How do you have an intelligent debate with a person who cannot even understand the difference between weather and climate.
Compared to a piece of **** like you, maybe I am! but at least I don't make up **** and post them here.Sorry, You don't know ether. Are You an idgit also?
Well happy new year to you to David. If that's your nasty tone then so be it. I'm actually surprised by this reply from you. (maybe you're still pissed from NYE?) Seems to be the only strategy your side can come up with. Well if it's unprovoked attack to me you can expect it back ten times over.What a moronic comment. That's something I would only expect from someone like Donald Trump. Hey wait a minute, I recall Donald said the same thing. Obviously, this is where you are getting a lot of your 'alternative facts'.
How do you have an intelligent debate with a person who cannot even understand the difference between weather and climate.
Now this is hilarious! :rollhappy:Dr. Kirby Hanson, the meteorologist who led the study, said in a telephone interview that the findings concerning the United States do not necessarily ''cast doubt'' on previous findings of a worldwide trend toward warmer temperatures, nor do they have a bearing one way or another on the theory that a buildup of pollutants is acting like a greenhouse and causing global warming. He said that the United States occupies only a small percentage of Earth's surface and that the new findings may be the result of regional variations.
Hmmm. So we are now almost 1/5 into the ''next'' century so we should be seeing a temp rise of between 0.6 and 1.6 degrees by now...Ha ha ha.. This is stuff is just gold! Oh maybe the warming has ''upset these predictions and produced unanticipated changes'' ???Several computer models have projected that the greenhouse effect would cause average global temperatures to rise between 3 and 8 degrees Fahrenheit in the next century. But scientists concede that reactions set off by the warming trend itself could upset these predictions and produce unanticipated changes in climate patterns. Legislative Action Sought
You still don't get it David. The word ''Climate'' as it is used in ''climate change'' is made up. It is meaningless.
It's just weather. Using a few years (30 or so) to determine if the climate is changing is just plain stupid. Sydney had 47 degrees the other day. It still did not break the 1939 record. Just weather.
As for the Guardian....Please!
You can't cherry pick where you start your line from. It goes up and down and up again and DOWN AGAIN! Bid deal if it has warmed 1.5 degrees in fifty years. The climate is NOT changing like you think it is. There is NOevidence of continual un-ending global warming. There just isn't. Forget about the warming predictions you see in the popular press. They are wrong.