A 3rd new specie

Discussion in 'Taxonomy' started by valenzino, Mar 24, 2017.

Slippertalk Orchid Forum

Help Support Slippertalk Orchid Forum:

  1. Mar 24, 2017 #1

    valenzino

    valenzino

    valenzino

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    3
  2. Mar 24, 2017 #2

    Chicago Chad

    Chicago Chad

    Chicago Chad

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    0
    This one I don't get Valenzino. How is this any different than argus or even urbanianum? The staminode, which is the defining characteristic for most paph taxonomy (unless I am mistaken) appears to be identical with argus. I see urbanianum characteristics in the pouch shape and interior spotting. As well as similarities in the dorsal and the type of spotting that is shown on the petals.

    With acmodontum, argus and urbanianum possibly overlapping geographically I tend to believe it is a combination of the above.

    What are your thoughts on it? I know you have more extensive knowledge of them than I.
     
  3. Mar 26, 2017 #3

    JAB

    JAB

    JAB

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2015
    Messages:
    973
    Likes Received:
    2
    Acmodontum is unique with its pointed lip though.
     
  4. Mar 26, 2017 #4

    Ozpaph

    Ozpaph

    Ozpaph

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    14,819
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    venustum X ???
     
  5. Mar 26, 2017 #5

    myxodex

    myxodex

    myxodex

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is what I thought at first, but this proposed species is from Java, a long way from the Phillipines. So if it is a hybrid then it is either a man made one or a horticultural escapee.
     
  6. Mar 26, 2017 #6

    Paphluvr

    Paphluvr

    Paphluvr

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    993
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Base of the Thumb, Michigan
    It looks a lot like schoserii, too, but with more striping in the dorsal. I haven't looked at a distribution map to see if the ranges of these mentioned species overlap.
     
  7. Mar 26, 2017 #7

    PaphMadMan

    PaphMadMan

    PaphMadMan

    phytomanic

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Madison, Wisconsin USA
    With origin on Java it does not overlap with any of the species mentioned here. Not even close. Nor with any other Barbata/Sigmatopetalum species but Paph javanicum apparently. Geographic isolation on a island distant from similar species is enough reason to define a presumptive new species unless it is identical in characteristics used to define another species. If it is from Java, it is new.
     
  8. Mar 27, 2017 #8

    Ozpaph

    Ozpaph

    Ozpaph

    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    14,819
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    I think that's the point. Is it from Java?
    History shows that many paphs dont come from where they were purported to come from.
    Some insitu population photos with geo-tagging is always welcome.
     

Share This Page

arrow_white