Search results

I only had good results with Avid on both Spider Mites and False Spider Mites.

I had a Paph. Quasar (Paph. rothschildianum x Paph. Macabre) that got awarded. Never had any blooming issues with it. Bloomed better and more reliable than my Iantha Stage. But Harold Koopowitz from OZ was a pain in the arse. When it came to even getting it to flower.

I used the pretty much the same mix in Baltimore,MD and here in Ohio. Had at best a 50% survival rate per flask. I started them (kentuckiense, and pubescens) in a protective cold frame before moving them to a raised bench.

But a lot of judges are a little on the jealous side. Especially when it comes to giving FCC's out

yep

I grow them both ways. But this one is potted

I didn't realize how bad the pic was till I put everything away.

thx

I have had this for years. It was originally purchased from Santa Barbara Orchid Estate

I have had good luck with Spaghnum, or bark based mixes (my mix of choice these days). Over the years I have grown many species and hybrids. I grew macrophylla in bark and didn't have any issues.

that group of judges really didn't want to give you those 90pts . Very nice

Will I was pulling weeds today. I seen mine is outside in my bed (2 hrs north of you) in a variation of your mix. Taking its sweet ol time!!!

very nice!!

I would agree on Paph. lowii and Maudiae hybrids. But I did have a Paph. esquireolei that would bloom 2x a year. It was a big many growth plant

I posted it once years ago. I thought it was dead but it finally bloomed again. I can't remember the cultivar name I gave it. Since the tag was lost and the was growing in the pot of my var. moreliana 'Harford II' . I have searched Flickr and all the forums with no luck. Could only find the alba...